Google describes exactly how they plan to suppress any information they deem unfit for readers. Highlighted at the bottom of page 108 Google states:
● Pages that directly contradict well established
scientific or medical consensus for queries seeking scientific or
medical information, unless the query indicates the user is seeking an alternative viewpoint.
● Pages that directly contradict well-established
historical facts (e.g., unsubstantiated conspiracy theories), unless
the query clearly indicates the user is seeking an alternative viewpoint.
These two guidelines provided by Google should set off alarm bells to anyone who has a thirst for knowledge or anyone that has the audacity to examine both sides of a topic. Imagine only being able to see and hear the corporate narrative on such important issues like vaccines, 9/11, holistic health, the Kennedy assassination, climate change, banking alternatives, and many other important matters. And that is only scratching the surface.
Melissa Dykes at Truth Stream Media was the one to uncover this strategy, see video below.
She states that Google isn’t just targeting conspiracy sites, but they are targeting any site which they feel would contradict “well-established, historical, and scientific facts.”
Just like in 1984, our opinions are being shaped by modified search engine results, and those alternative views will become fewer and fewer.
Thomas Dishaw wisely suggests alternates to Google: GoodGopher, DuckDuckGo, Yandex, Searx.me and Qwant.com.
Finally, there is an extensive list of great sites in the GovtSlaves site. Be sure to bookmark them.